A Maltese businessman accused of plotting the 2017 car‑bomb killing of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia has been acquitted by a Maltese court, closing one of the criminal proceedings linked to the assassination that shocked Europe and triggered a political crisis in Malta. The verdict ends the trial of the individual who was alleged to have supplied equipment used in the bombing, while three men previously convicted in 2022 for carrying out the attack remain imprisoned. The case has drawn sustained international attention because of Caruana Galizia’s reporting on high‑level corruption, money laundering, and alleged links between political and business elites in Malta.
What happened
On 2 September 2026 the Criminal Court of Malta delivered a not‑guilty verdict for the businessman charged with conspiring to murder Daphne Caruana Galizia. The prosecution had argued that he provided equipment that was used to assemble the car bomb that killed the journalist on 16 October 2017 as she drove away from her home near Bidnija. After reviewing the evidence presented, the judge ruled that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was involved in the plot. The decision was announced in open court and reported by Al Jazeera, which noted that the acquittal “ended one chapter of a case that had drawn international attention over allegations of corruption and state collusion in Malta.” The three individuals who were convicted in 2022 of actually carrying out the bombing — identified in earlier proceedings as the bomb‑maker, the driver, and an accomplice — remain serving their sentences.
Why it matters
The acquittal touches on broader questions about accountability for the murder of a journalist whose investigations exposed alleged wrongdoing at the highest levels of Maltese politics and business. Caruana Galizia’s work, particularly her coverage of the Panama Papers and alleged kick‑back schemes involving senior officials, had made her a focal point for press‑freedom advocates across Europe. Her killing prompted a domestic political crisis that led to the resignation of several ministers and triggered calls for an independent public inquiry. The subsequent Daphne Caruana Galizia Public Inquiry, which concluded in 2024, found that the Maltese state bore responsibility for fostering a “climate of impunity” that contributed to her death. Although the inquiry lacked prosecutorial power, its findings intensified scrutiny of Malta’s judicial and political institutions. The businessman’s acquittal therefore leaves unresolved the extent to which individuals beyond the direct perpetrators may have participated in or facilitated the killing, a point that press‑freedom groups continue to highlight as they demand full accountability.
Background and context
Daphne Caruana Galizia was an investigative journalist whose blog, Running Commentary, detailed alleged corruption, money‑laundering schemes, and links between Malta’s political elite and private business interests. Her reporting on the Panama Papers revealed how offshore companies tied to senior officials were used to conceal assets and facilitate questionable financial flows. In the years preceding her murder, she faced numerous legal threats and harassment, which she documented publicly. On 16 October 2017, a bomb placed under her car detonated as she was driving, killing her instantly. The attack provoked outrage across the European Union and led to the establishment of a public inquiry in 2020, tasked with examining the circumstances surrounding her death and any institutional failures that may have enabled it.
The inquiry’s final report, released in 2024, concluded that while the actual perpetrators were three individuals convicted in 2022, the state had failed to protect the journalist and had allowed a culture of impunity to develop. It cited shortcomings in police investigations, prosecutorial oversight, and the broader regulatory environment that permitted alleged corrupt practices to flourish. The report did not assign criminal liability to any specific state officials, but it recommended reforms to strengthen whistle‑blower protections, improve transparency in public procurement, and enhance the independence of the judiciary.
In the criminal proceedings that followed, prosecutors charged several individuals with varying degrees of involvement. The three men convicted in 2022 were found guilty of actually constructing and detonating the bomb. The businessman acquitted in September 2026 had been accused of providing technical assistance or equipment that facilitated the bombing. The court’s decision underscored the evidentiary threshold required to link a suspect to a conspiracy, particularly when the alleged role is indirect or supportive rather than executory.
What to watch next
The acquittal may influence several ongoing developments. First, the family of Daphne Caruana Galizia has repeatedly stated that they believe not all individuals connected to the killing have been examined, and they may pursue additional legal avenues, such as civil suits or requests for further investigative measures, to uncover any remaining links. Second, press‑freedom organizations including Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists are likely to cite the case in their advocacy for stronger protective measures for journalists across Europe, arguing that the outcome demonstrates gaps in the ability of courts to prosecute alleged conspirators beyond the immediate perpetrators. Third, Maltese authorities could face renewed pressure to implement the reforms recommended by the public inquiry, particularly those aimed at improving investigative capacity and ensuring that allegations of state‑linked corruption are pursued rigorously. Finally, any future disclosures — whether from whistle‑blowers, leaked documents, or ongoing judicial inquiries — could prompt prosecutors to revisit the evidence against individuals who were not charged in the initial trial, though such actions would depend on the emergence of new, admissible proof.
Conclusion
The September 2026 acquittal of the Maltese businessman charged with plotting the murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia marks a notable moment in a case that has become synonymous with the struggle for press freedom and accountability in Malta. While the verdict resolves the criminal liability of one suspect, it leaves open questions about the broader network that may have enabled the killing. The outcome underscores the challenges prosecutors face when attempting to prove conspiracy charges that rely on indirect or facilitative roles, and it reinforces the importance of the public inquiry’s findings regarding institutional shortcomings. As Caruana Galizia’s family, press‑freedom groups, and Maltese authorities continue to grapple with the legacy of her death, the case will likely remain a reference point for efforts to strengthen protections for journalists and to address the systemic factors that allow such crimes to occur.
Sources
Al Jazeera News — https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/2/malta-businessman-acquitted-of-plotting-journalist-caruana-galizia-murder
Source: Al Jazeera News
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Al Jazeera News — source
