Legal professional Nitin Thakker, a practitioner since 1968, has raised concerns regarding the erosion of political integrity and the diminishing accessibility of public leadership in India. Reflecting on the nation’s trajectory during the India@79 commemorations, Thakker contrasted the perceived moral clarity and openness of past political eras with the current state of governance. His observations link the physical modernization of India’s urban landscapes with a perceived regression in the social and ethical standards of its political class.
The reflections were shared by Thakker as part of a broader discussion on the evolution of the Indian state and its civic life. Drawing on over five decades of experience within the legal system, Thakker asserted that political leaders of previous generations maintained a “clean image” and were significantly more approachable to the average citizen. According to Thakker, the current political landscape is characterized by a widening gap between the governing elite and the public they serve, suggesting that the transparency and personal accountability that once defined leadership have been replaced by more distant and opaque structures of power.
This critique of political accessibility is framed against a backdrop of immense material progress. Thakker noted that his own life has mirrored the technological and infrastructural transformation of the region. He recalled traveling on the city’s electric trams—a primary mode of urban transit that ceased operations in 1964—and contrasted that experience with his current use of the underground Metro Line 3, which became operational in 2025. For Thakker, the transition from the tram to the high-tech metro serves as a tangible marker of India’s leap into modernity.
Analysis:
The juxtaposition of infrastructure and integrity in Thakker’s testimony highlights a critical tension in India’s development narrative. While the state has successfully scaled its physical capabilities—moving from the rudimentary electric trams of the 1960s to the sophisticated engineering of the 2025 Metro Line 3—there is a suggestion that institutional health has not kept pace with engineering feats.
The “approachability” Thakker references is not merely a matter of social etiquette but a reflection of the power dynamics inherent in governance. In earlier decades, the proximity between the representative and the constituent acted as an informal mechanism of accountability. The current perceived distance suggests a shift toward a more centralized, hierarchical model of leadership where access is mediated by party machinery and security apparatuses rather than civic openness. This suggests that while the “hardware” of the nation (its roads, rails, and digital systems) has been upgraded, the “software” of its democracy—specifically the ethical conduct and accessibility of its leaders—may be experiencing a decline.
The legal perspective is particularly relevant here. As a lawyer practicing since 1968, Thakker has operated at the intersection of law and power for nearly sixty years. His observation regarding the “clean image” of past leaders implies a shift in the public’s perception of corruption and legitimacy. It suggests that the institutional safeguards or social pressures that once compelled leaders to maintain a facade of purity have weakened, or that the nature of political power has become so concentrated that the need for a “clean image” has been superseded by the necessity of maintaining control.
The evolution of urban transit also serves as a proxy for the changing nature of public space. Trams, by their nature, were street-level and integrated into the daily flow of city life. The Metro, while vastly more efficient, is an underground, controlled environment. This physical shift from the street to the subterranean may symbolically mirror the shift in political leadership: moving from the visible, accessible public square to the insulated, protected corridors of power.
Looking ahead, the points raised by Thakker signal several key areas for civic scrutiny. First, there is the question of how digital governance and “e-governance” initiatives are affecting actual accessibility. While governments often claim that digital portals make them more accessible, critics argue these tools often replace genuine human interaction and accountability with automated responses and bureaucratic filters.
Second, the trend toward the professionalization of politics—where leadership is increasingly drawn from a narrow set of wealthy or well-connected elites—may further exacerbate the distance Thakker describes. As the cost of contesting elections rises, the “approachability” of a leader often becomes a luxury or a calculated campaign tactic rather than a genuine trait of governance.
Finally, the tension between rapid infrastructure growth and institutional decay remains a central theme for India’s future. The success of projects like Metro Line 3 demonstrates a high capacity for execution, but the sustainability of such growth depends on the integrity of the systems managing them. If the “clean image” and approachability of leadership continue to decline, the risk of systemic corruption in large-scale public works increases, potentially undermining the very modernization the country seeks.
In conclusion, Nitin Thakker’s reflections provide a longitudinal view of the Indian experience, suggesting that material advancement is not a substitute for moral and institutional integrity. His account serves as a reminder that the true measure of a nation’s progress is not found solely in the speed of its trains or the depth of its tunnels, but in the accessibility and accountability of those who hold power. As India continues to evolve, the challenge remains to reconcile its high-tech future with the civic virtues of transparency and public service that Thakker recalls from the past.
Sources:
Hindustan Times – India News: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/nitin-thakker-political-leaders-were-far-more-approachable-had-clean-image-101786720569872.html
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Hindustan Times – India News — source
