A Maltese court has acquitted businessman Yorgen Fenech of charges that he commissioned the 2017 car bomb assassination of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, a verdict that has drawn sharp condemnation from press freedom advocates and renewed scrutiny of Malta’s judicial independence and rule-of-law commitments.
Fenech, a prominent Maltese businessman who once controlled the Tumas Group and other enterprises across the island’s financial and hospitality sectors, was charged with complicity to murder and criminal association in connection with the killing. The verdict was delivered Thursday in the Valletta Criminal Court, leaving unresolved the central question of who ordered Caruana Galizia’s assassination.
Caruana Galizia, 53, was killed on October 16, 2017, when a bomb placed beneath her rented Peugeot 107 detonated as she drove away from her home in the village of Bidur, Malta. She had spent years investigating corruption, money laundering, and offshore financial networks linked to senior Maltese political figures, including then-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat and his chief of staff. Her blog, Running Commentary, had a readership that dwarfed Malta’s mainstream media outlets.
What Happened
Prosecutors alleged that Fenech financed the murder plot, presenting evidence that included intercepted communications and testimony from Vincent Muscat, a self-confessed middleman who pleaded guilty in a separate case. Vincent Muscat, who was convicted in 2021 and sentenced to 15 years for his role in the assassination, reportedly told investigators he received payment from Fenech to arrange the killing.
The defence countered that no direct evidence connected Fenech to the planning or execution of the attack. Fenech’s legal team argued that the prosecution’s case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of individuals seeking reduced sentences in their own cases.
The three men convicted in 2023 of actually carrying out the bombing—Alfredo Skehill, George Degiorgio, and Valeric KL—but did not testify that Fenech directed them. Their convictions related to physically assembling and detonating the device.
Fenech had been arrested in November 2019 after attempting to flee Malta aboard a yacht, an episode that prompted resignations within the Muscat government and contributed to the prime minister’s eventual departure from office.
Why It Matters
The acquittal represents a significant failure in the years-long effort to achieve full accountability for Caruana Galizia’s murder. While the physical perpetrators have been convicted, the chain of command leading to the assassination remains unestablished in court.
Press freedom organisations were swift in their condemnation.
Reporters Without Borders described the verdict as a setback for accountability in Malta, stating that the failure to convict those who commissioned the killing undermines protections for journalists across the European Union. The European Federation of Journalists called for a renewed and expanded investigation into who directed the killing and why state institutions failed to prevent it.
The Council of Europe’s anti-corruption body, GRECO, has previously faulted Malta for weaknesses in judicial independence, whistleblower protections, and press freedom safeguards. The European Parliament’s Special Committee on organised crime, corruption, and money laundering has also documented concerns about Malta’s financial sector and the adequacy of its rule-of-law institutions.
For Caruana Galizia’s family, the acquittal is a painful reminder that justice remains incomplete. They have pursued civil litigation and formal complaints in multiple jurisdictions, alleging that Maltese state actors failed to protect her from known threats and that officials obstructed early investigations into her killing.
A 2024 independent public inquiry concluded that the Maltese state bore responsibility for creating conditions that enabled the assassination, including failures to investigate threats against Caruana Galizia and systemic weaknesses in press freedom protections. However, the inquiry did not establish who specifically ordered the killing.
Background and Context
Caruana Galizia’s investigations into Maltese corruption drew international attention in the years before her death. Her 2016 reporting on the Panama Papers revealed that Azerbaijan’s president Ilham Aliyev and his family had hidden wealth through Maltese companies. She also reported on alleged kickback schemes involving the country’s citizenship-by-investment programme and suspicious dealings in the country’s energy sector.
Her most explosive revelations concerned the 17 Black company, an offshore entity that authorities say was intended as a vehicle for bribing Maltese government officials. Fenech’s involvement with 17 Black became central to the prosecution’s case.
The killing of a journalist on European Union soil prompted sustained pressure from Brussels. The European Commission initiated proceedings against Malta under Article 7 of the EU Treaty, a mechanism that can suspend certain membership rights. While those proceedings did not result in sanctions, they contributed to political pressure that eventually forced Muscat’s resignation in 2020.
Malta’s financial sector has historically attracted scrutiny from international regulators. The island became a centre for European financial services partly through its citizenship-by-investment programme and its low-tax corporate structures. Caruana Galizia’s reporting highlighted connections between elements of the financial industry and the political establishment.
The European Commission has tied Malta’s continued participation in certain EU funding mechanisms to demonstrated reforms in judicial independence and anti-corruption enforcement. Thursday’s verdict may complicate Malta’s position in ongoing assessments.
What to Watch Next
Repubblika, a Maltese civil society organisation that has campaigned for justice in the case, announced it would seek to appeal Thursday’s ruling. Any appeal would be heard by higher courts and could take months or years to resolve.
Investigators may continue pursuing leads on who commissioned the killing. The acquittal of Fenech does not preclude the possibility that other individuals could be charged if evidence emerges.
The Caruana Galizia family has indicated they will continue their civil litigation efforts, which include cases before the European Court of Human Rights. Those proceedings allege violations of the family’s rights to life and to an effective investigation under the European Convention on Human Rights.
European institutions are expected to continue monitoring Malta’s rule-of-law environment. GRECO is scheduled to publish its next assessment, which will likely address developments in the Caruana Galizia case and related reforms.
The longer-term question concerns the chilling effect on investigative journalism in Malta and beyond. Press freedom advocates argue that unpunished killings of journalists send a message that silences critical reporting on powerful interests.
Conclusion
Thursday’s verdict marks a frustrating conclusion to one of the most closely watched murder cases in European recent history. While the convictions of the physical perpetrators demonstrated that Malta could achieve some measure of accountability, the acquittal of the alleged mastermind leaves the murder’s ultimate sponsors unidentified and unpunished.
For Caruana Galizia’s readers—a significant portion of Malta’s population who relied on her reporting as their primary source of information on official conduct—the verdict offers no comfort. Her investigations remain unrefuted in their substance, but the institutions she challenged have yet to face full accountability.
The case has exposed persistent weaknesses in Malta’s justice system and its capacity to investigate crimes involving powerful defendants. Whether subsequent appeals, civil proceedings, or renewed investigations will succeed where the criminal case faltered remains to be seen. What is clear is that the question Daphne Caruana Galizia raised through her work—who truly governs Malta, and at whose behest—remains as urgent and unanswered as ever.
Sources
https://www.dw.com/en/outrage-as-maltese-tycoon-acquitted-in-journalist-s-murder/a-79027008
Source: DW News
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: DW News — source
