Close to one million Indian nationals are caught in the United States’ employment-based green card backlog, accounting for roughly seventy-nine percent of all applicants stuck in employment-based preference categories, according to immigration data highlighted in recent reporting. The most severe delays affect the EB-2 and EB-3 categories, the primary employment-based pathways for skilled professionals in technology, engineering, medicine, and finance. Under current projections cited in immigration analysis, some Indian applicants in the EB-2 category may face waits stretching as long as 179 years, a figure that, if accurate, would render the visa effectively inaccessible within any single applicant’s lifetime.
The scale of the delay has raised renewed questions about whether the current system of annual visa caps and per-country limits remains functional, and whether the United States is prepared to absorb the diplomatic, economic, and human costs of a queue that grows longer every year.
What Happened
The backlog figures surfaced in immigration-policy reporting that drew on data from the US State Department’s Visa Bulletin and from organizations that track employment-based wait times. The roughly one-million-applicant figure refers specifically to Indian nationals whose approved immigrant petitions have placed them in line for a green card but who cannot yet adjust their status because the annual supply of visas has been exhausted for years in advance.
The EB-2 category, which covers members of professions holding advanced degrees or persons of exceptional ability, accounts for the largest share of the Indian backlog. The EB-3 category, covering skilled workers, professionals, and other workers, carries a similar although somewhat shorter projected wait. Together, the two categories represent the main routes through which Indian professionals, many of whom first entered the United States on H-1B temporary work visas, seek permanent residence.
Indian nationals form the largest single group affected by the backlog, followed by Chinese and Filipino nationals, both of whom also face per-country constraints. The concentration of Indian applicants reflects the structural reality that demand from India has consistently exceeded the seven-percent per-country cap, while the overall annual cap on employment-based green cards has remained fixed by statute.
Why It Matters
The backlog’s human and economic consequences extend well beyond immigration paperwork. For individual applicants, the multi-decade wait means prolonged dependence on employer sponsorship, restricted ability to change jobs without restarting the green card process, and limited capacity to start businesses, pursue academic positions, or make long-term financial commitments on equal footing with permanent residents. Many of those waiting are mid-career professionals with families, US-born children, mortgages, and decades of tax contributions already behind them.
For US employers, particularly in the technology and healthcare sectors, the backlog represents a workforce trapped in permanent temporary status. Companies that sponsor green card petitions often lose workers to competitors or to overseas opportunities once those workers conclude that adjustment of status is effectively unattainable. Analysts have argued that the system creates a structural inefficiency: the United States selects skilled workers through the H-1B program, invests in their training and integration, and then denies them the stability needed to contribute at full capacity.
For US-India relations, the scale of the affected diaspora — estimated at more than 4.4 million people, including those on temporary visas and permanent residents — gives the backlog diplomatic weight. Indian-American civic groups, technology industry associations, and trade bodies have repeatedly raised the issue in discussions with lawmakers, and the topic is likely to surface in any future bilateral dialogue on labor mobility and trade.
Background and Context
The structural problem stems from two intersecting constraints embedded in US immigration law. The Immigration and Nationality Act sets an annual cap on employment-based green cards at 140,000, a figure that has not been adjusted for inflation, population growth, or shifts in labor demand since 1990. Within that cap, no single country may receive more than seven percent of the visas issued in a given year.
The per-country limit was originally intended to ensure geographic diversity in immigration flows and to prevent any one nation from dominating employment-based categories. In practice, the cap has produced the opposite effect in categories dominated by nationals of large, skilled-workforce-exporting countries. Because demand from India and China far exceeds seven percent of the available visas, the per-country ceiling has created separate, far longer queues for applicants from those countries, while nationals of smaller countries face relatively short waits.
Each year, new applicants are added to the queue faster than existing ones are cleared, causing the backlog to grow. The result is a multi-decade waiting list that affects mostly highly skilled workers, many of whom entered the United States on temporary H-1B visas and have since transitioned to employer-sponsored green card sponsorship. Indian nationals represent the largest single group affected, followed by Chinese and Filipino nationals, according to data tracked by the US State Department’s Visa Bulletin and organizations monitoring immigration wait times.
The 179-year projection for some EB-2 applicants is a mathematical consequence of this imbalance. It assumes continuation of current demand, current caps, and current per-country limits, and is not a forecast of any individual applicant’s actual wait, which depends on priority date, category, and country of chargeability. Nonetheless, analysts describe the figure as a useful illustration of how the system behaves when demand vastly outstrips supply within a fixed ceiling.
Analysis: A System Designed for a Different Era
The 179-year projection, while startling, reflects a straightforward mathematical consequence of demand vastly outstripping supply within a fixed cap. Immigration analysts have long warned that the per-country limit, originally intended to ensure geographic diversity in immigration flows, has produced perverse results in categories dominated by nationals of large, skilled-workforce-exporting countries. For Indian professionals, particularly those working in the US technology sector, the backlog means decades of professional uncertainty, restrictions on job mobility, and in some cases forced departure from the country despite long-standing employment and tax contributions.
The figures also carry economic significance. US employers, particularly in the technology and healthcare sectors, have come to rely on Indian H-1B holders and green card applicants to fill specialized roles. A workforce trapped in permanent temporary status represents both a human cost and an economic inefficiency, as workers face reduced ability to change employers, start businesses, or negotiate compensation on equal footing with permanent residents.
The headline figure of approximately one million Indians in the backlog does not capture the full human dimension. Many of those waiting are mid-career professionals with families, mortgages, and US-born children. The wait time projections compound across generations: an applicant who begins the process today may not see adjustment of status within their working life, and the question of what happens to their families and careers during that period is one that current immigration law does not adequately address. The scale of the backlog also raises questions about whether the United States is unintentionally creating a permanent underclass of skilled workers with limited rights and uncertain futures, a situation with implications for both labor policy and the country’s ability to retain global talent.
What to Watch Next
Efforts to address the backlog have surfaced in multiple Congresses but have not resulted in legislative change. Proposals have ranged from raising or eliminating per-country caps, recapturing unused visas from prior years, to creating new visa categories for STEM professionals. Each has faced political resistance, often along partisan lines, with disagreements over the broader scale of immigration and the pace of labor-market integration.
Several indicators will shape whether the situation changes in 2026 and beyond. The Department of State’s monthly Visa Bulletin releases will reveal whether priority-date movement accelerates, stalls, or regresses, providing a near-real-time measure of queue clearance. Any movement on the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, which would eliminate the per-country cap, would directly affect Indian and Chinese applicants, though the bill has stalled in previous Congresses. Litigation challenging the per-country limit, including cases that have reached federal appellate courts, could produce judicial decisions that alter the system’s mechanics without legislative action. Administrative actions, such as expanded premium processing or reinterpretation of existing rules, may offer marginal relief but cannot resolve the underlying supply imbalance.
The lack of legislative movement has made immigration reform advocacy a fixture of Indian-American civic engagement. Organizations representing affected workers have pushed for what they describe as a “recapture” of unused visa numbers from prior fiscal years, a step that analysts estimate could clear significant portions of the backlog without expanding the overall annual cap. Whether such a measure gains traction in the current Congress remains unclear.
Conclusion
Without statutory change, the mathematics of the backlog will continue to produce the same outcome: longer waits, larger queues, and a growing gap between the stated goals of US immigration policy and its real-world effects on the workers it is designed to attract. The roughly one million Indian nationals currently caught in the system represent both a policy failure and a strategic vulnerability, given the country’s reliance on skilled immigrant labor in technology, healthcare, and engineering. Whether Congress, the courts, or the executive branch acts to break the impasse will determine whether the United States retains the global talent its economy depends on, or continues to lose it to competitors willing to offer faster, more predictable paths to permanent residence.
Sources
Times of India: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/nri/nearly-one-million-indians-stuck-in-us-green-card-backlog-eb-2-wait-could-stretch-to-179-years/articleshow/133571683.cms
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Times of India – Top Stories — source
