Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu has released a comprehensive analysis titled “What Happened to Liberal Democracy?”, which scrutinizes the systemic failures of modern governing elites and their inability to address the needs of the general population. The work posits that the current global crisis of liberal democracy is not an inevitable historical cycle, but a direct consequence of a breakdown in the social contract, where institutional power has become decoupled from the public interest.
The central thesis of Acemoglu’s work is that the stability of a democratic system relies on a reciprocal relationship: the public grants legitimacy to governing institutions in exchange for the provision of security, economic opportunity, and the protection of rights. Acemoglu argues that modern elites—spanning political, corporate, and technocratic spheres—have ceased to meet these fundamental requirements for a significant portion of the population. This failure has created a systemic vacuum, leaving the masses susceptible to populist movements and authoritarian alternatives that promise the stability and efficacy that liberal institutions no longer provide.
According to the analysis, the erosion of democracy is driven by the tendency of elites to prioritize the maintenance of their own power and the protection of narrow interests over the broader societal good. This “elite failure” manifests as a refusal to address structural inequalities, a disregard for the economic displacement caused by rapid technological shifts, and a growing insulation of decision-makers from the lived realities of the citizenry.
Analysis:
Acemoglu’s approach represents a significant shift in the discourse surrounding democratic backsliding. For years, much of the commentary on the rise of populism has focused on cultural grievances, identity politics, or the “misinformation” of the electorate. By framing the crisis as a failure of institutional accountability, Acemoglu moves the focus from the psychology of the voter to the performance of the governor. This perspective suggests that the erosion of democracy is not an organic or inevitable process, but a result of specific policy and leadership failures. Consequently, this framing places the burden of repair squarely on the institutions and power-holders rather than the electorate.
The significance of this work lies in its challenge to the narrative of “inevitable decline.” In recent years, several influential figures have suggested that the era of liberal democracy has simply reached its natural end. A prominent example is tech billionaire Peter Thiel, who argued in his 2009 essay, “The Education of a Libertarian,” that freedom and democracy are no longer compatible in the modern age. Thiel’s perspective suggests a fundamental contradiction between the democratic process and the preservation of individual liberty, implying that the decline of the former is a prerequisite for the latter.
Acemoglu explicitly contrasts his findings with this libertarian fatalism. While Thiel views the tension as an inherent philosophical flaw, Acemoglu views it as a structural failure. By treating the decline as a result of specific institutional choices, Acemoglu argues that the system is, in theory, fixable. The crisis is not a result of a flawed philosophy of democracy, but of a flawed implementation of it by those in power.
The background of this analysis is rooted in Acemoglu’s career-long study of how institutions shape the wealth and health of nations. His previous work has consistently highlighted that “inclusive” institutions—those that distribute power and opportunity broadly—are the primary drivers of long-term prosperity. In “What Happened to Liberal Democracy?”, he applies this framework to the current moment, suggesting that liberal democracies are transitioning from “inclusive” to “extractive” models. In an extractive system, the political and economic machinery is designed to extract wealth and influence from the many to benefit the few.
This transition is particularly evident in the intersection of Big Tech and government. Acemoglu examines how the concentration of data and algorithmic power has created new forms of elite control that bypass traditional democratic checks and balances. When the tools of governance and information are controlled by a small, unaccountable technocracy, the public’s ability to influence policy is diminished, further alienating the population from the democratic process.
Looking forward, the focus shifts to how these systems can be repaired. Acemoglu suggests that fixing the system requires more than superficial policy tweaks; it requires a fundamental redistribution of institutional agency. This includes creating mechanisms that force elites to be responsive to the needs of the marginalized and rebuilding the social safety nets that once anchored the middle class to the democratic project.
What to watch next will be the reaction of institutional leaders to this evidence-based critique. As the gap between institutional power and public interest continues to widen, the pressure on governing bodies to move beyond rhetoric and toward structural reform will increase. Observers should monitor whether governments implement genuine institutional changes—such as campaign finance reform, antitrust actions against Big Tech, or new forms of participatory budgeting—or whether they continue to rely on the “cultural grievance” narrative to explain away systemic instability.
Ultimately, Acemoglu’s work serves as a warning: the legitimacy of liberal democracy is not a permanent endowment but a leased asset that must be renewed through performance. If the governing elites continue to fail in their basic obligations to the public, the vacuum they leave behind will likely be filled by forces that do not value democratic norms at all. The survival of the system depends not on the education of the masses, but on the accountability of the powerful.
Sources:
Guardian International: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/aug/07/what-happened-to-liberal-democracy-by-daron-acemoglu-review-how-to-fix-the-system
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Guardian International — source
