A 47-year-old woman has appeared in court facing multiple charges after allegedly stabbing four men in the back with a pair of scissors in London’s Covent Garden. The defendant, Stella Gollovena, is accused of carrying out a series of attacks in one of the city’s most prominent tourist hubs, leaving four victims wounded.
The proceedings, held in the wake of the incidents, have brought to light the specific nature of the assaults, which court documents indicate were targeted attacks from behind. Gollovena has been formally charged with four counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH), a serious offense under UK law that requires the prosecution to prove the defendant intended to cause really serious harm.
The victims identified during the court proceedings include Patrick De Barr, Thomas Harding, and a man identified as Adrian. The court heard that the weapon used in all four instances was a pair of scissors, which the defendant allegedly used to strike the victims in their backs.
The attacks took place within the Covent Garden district, an area known for its high density of pedestrians, street performers, and international tourists. The nature of the weapon and the method of attack—stabbing victims in the back—have become central points of the prosecution’s case as they seek to establish the intent and premeditation behind the violence.
Analysis: The charge of “wounding with intent” is a significant legal escalation from standard assault or wounding. In the English legal system, this specific charge suggests that the prosecution believes there is sufficient evidence to prove that the injuries were not accidental or a result of a spontaneous struggle, but were the result of a conscious decision to inflict severe physical harm. The fact that all four victims were stabbed in the back further supports a narrative of targeted aggression rather than defensive violence, as attacks from behind typically preclude claims of self-defense.
The location of the attacks adds a layer of public concern to the case. Covent Garden is one of London’s most heavily surveilled and policed areas due to its status as a global tourist destination. The ability of a suspect to wound four separate individuals in such a high-traffic environment raises questions regarding the timeline of the attacks and whether they occurred in rapid succession or over a period of time.
Historically, Covent Garden has been a focal point for London’s retail and entertainment sectors, making it a high-visibility zone for the Metropolitan Police. Incidents of violent crime in such areas often trigger immediate reviews of local security protocols and CCTV coverage. The use of a common household object, such as scissors, as a weapon also highlights the volatility of “improvised” weaponry in urban environments, where items not traditionally classified as offensive weapons can be used to cause grievous harm.
The legal proceedings against Gollovena will now move toward the evidentiary phase. The prosecution will likely rely on a combination of victim testimony, forensic evidence from the wounds, and potential CCTV footage from the surrounding businesses and public squares to reconstruct the events. The defense will be tasked with challenging the “intent” aspect of the GBH charges, potentially arguing a lack of premeditation or presenting mitigating circumstances regarding the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the attacks.
What to watch next will be the disclosure of the specific timeline of the attacks. It remains unclear whether the four men were targeted as part of a single spree or if the attacks were isolated incidents occurring over a longer duration. Furthermore, the court will need to determine if there was a prior relationship between Gollovena and the victims, or if the attacks were random. Any evidence of a connection between the parties would significantly alter the analysis of the motive.
Additionally, the medical reports for Patrick De Barr, Thomas Harding, and the other victims will be critical. The severity of the wounds—specifically the depth of the punctures and whether any vital organs were compromised—will influence the sentencing guidelines should the defendant be convicted. Under the Sentencing Council guidelines for wounding with intent, the severity of the injury and the use of a weapon are primary aggravating factors.
The case also brings attention to the security of London’s “Tourist Zones.” While these areas are heavily monitored, the occurrence of a multi-victim attack using a concealed weapon underscores the challenges faced by urban policing in preventing opportunistic violence.
In conclusion, the case of Stella Gollovena represents a serious breach of public safety in one of London’s most iconic districts. With four counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, the legal stakes are high for the defendant. As the court examines the evidence surrounding the use of scissors to stab four men in the back, the focus remains on establishing the motive and the level of intent behind these violent acts.
Sources: [The Guardian World](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/aug/06/covent-garden-victims-stabbed-in-the-back-with-pair-of-scissors-court-hears)
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: The Guardian World — source
