The Ministry of Railways has issued a formal directive mandating that all passengers traveling under Reservation Against Cancellation (RAC) status in air-conditioned (AC) coaches be provided with complete bedroll kits. The order, issued following a surge of passenger grievances, seeks to eliminate the inconsistent application of service standards across different railway zones and divisions.
Under the current directive, the Ministry has clarified that RAC passengers are to be treated as bona fide passengers regarding the provision of amenities. The only exception to this requirement is travel in AC Chair Cars, where bedrolls are not standard.
The directive, dated August 4, 2026, serves as a stern reminder to railway staff and administrative bodies that Railway Board instructions regarding passenger amenities are not optional. The Ministry emphasized that the denial of bedrolls to RAC passengers constitutes a failure to adhere to established protocols.
The move comes after numerous reports from travelers who, despite paying for AC class travel and holding a valid RAC ticket, were denied basic bedding and linens by onboard staff. In many instances, passengers reported that staff claimed bedrolls were reserved exclusively for those with fully confirmed berths, despite the RAC status granting the passenger a legal right to travel in that specific class of coach.
Analysis:
The necessity for the Ministry to reiterate these guidelines indicates a systemic lapse in operational consistency. The gap between the Railway Board’s written policies and the actual experience of passengers suggests that onboard staff and zonal managers have been exercising unauthorized discretion in the distribution of amenities.
By explicitly stating that RAC passengers are “at par” with other bona fide passengers, the Ministry is attempting to standardize service delivery. This is not merely a matter of comfort but one of consumer rights; passengers in the RAC category pay the fare associated with AC travel. When staff deny these amenities, they are effectively providing a lower tier of service for a premium price. This directive is an attempt to close the loophole where “confirmed” status was being used as a proxy for “entitled to service,” rather than the ticket class itself.
The recurring nature of these complaints suggests that previous verbal instructions or circulars were either ignored or poorly communicated to the frontline staff—the TTEs (Traveling Ticket Examiners) and cleaning crews—who manage the physical distribution of linens.
The RAC system is designed to provide a guarantee of travel in a specific class, even if a full berth is not immediately available. In an RAC scenario, two passengers typically share a single side-lower berth for sitting during the day, with the hope that cancellations will upgrade one or both to a full berth before the journey concludes.
Despite the shared seating arrangement, the fare paid by an RAC passenger is identical to that of a confirmed passenger in the same coach. Consequently, the provision of a bedroll—which includes a sheet, pillow, and blanket—is a contractual obligation of the railway service. The denial of these kits has historically led to friction between passengers and railway staff, often escalating into formal complaints via social media and the RailMadad portal.
This issue is particularly acute during peak travel seasons or on high-demand routes where RAC lists are long. In such environments, the pressure on onboard resources can lead staff to prioritize confirmed passengers, leading to the discriminatory treatment of those in the RAC category.
The Ministry’s intervention is a step toward institutional accountability. By issuing a formal letter, the Ministry creates a documentary trail that can be used to hold zonal managers accountable if complaints persist. It signals a shift toward a more passenger-centric approach, where the “bona fide” status of the ticket outweighs the specific berth assignment.
Moving forward, the focus will shift to the implementation of this directive at the ground level. Passengers and consumer watchdogs will likely monitor whether the “at par” treatment is actually realized in the coaches. A key point of contention will be whether the railways have sufficient inventory of bedroll kits to accommodate the increasing number of RAC passengers on crowded trains. If the shortage is physical rather than administrative, a simple directive may not suffice, and the Ministry may need to invest in increased linen procurement.
Furthermore, there is a question of oversight. The Ministry will need to establish a mechanism to verify that these instructions are being followed, perhaps through surprise audits or by analyzing the frequency of bedroll-related complaints on the RailMadad platform following the August 4 order.
The reiteration of the bedroll mandate is a corrective measure intended to align the reality of railway travel with the official rules of the Railway Board. While the directive addresses a specific amenity, it highlights a broader challenge facing the Indian Railways: ensuring that service standards are uniform across a massive, decentralized network of zones and divisions. For the passenger, the directive affirms that the right to basic amenities is tied to the ticket class and the payment of the fare, not the luck of the berth allocation.
Sources:
The Hindu – National (https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/railway-ministry-reiterates-bedroll-kit-directive-for-rac-passengers-after-repeated-complaints/article71308263.ece)
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: The Hindu – National — source
