Residents of Set Zaynab, a town in southern Damascus, are navigating a precarious social landscape as the psychological and sectarian scars of Syria’s decade-long conflict continue to linger. Despite a prolonged period of relative stability and the absence of active combat, locals report that fears rooted in the war still dictate daily interactions and community dynamics, leaving the town in a state of suspended recovery.
The town, which holds immense religious significance, serves as a critical case study for the complexities of post-war reconciliation in Syria. While the physical infrastructure may be stabilizing, the social fabric remains strained by deep-seated sectarian tensions that were systematically exacerbated during the height of the civil war. For the people of Set Zaynab, the transition from a war zone to a peaceful community has proven to be a psychological struggle as much as a political one.
The Current State of Stability
In recent years, Set Zaynab has transitioned away from the immediate threat of artillery and urban warfare. However, residents describe the current environment as a “fragile peace.” This term reflects a reality where the cessation of gunfire has not yet translated into a comprehensive sense of security or communal trust.
Daily life in the town is characterized by a cautious coexistence. While markets are open and religious pilgrimages continue, the interactions between different social and religious groups are often marked by an underlying apprehension. Locals indicate that the trauma of the conflict—marked by targeted violence and the politicization of religious identity—has left a lasting imprint on how neighbors perceive one another. The fear is not necessarily of a renewed military offensive, but of the dormant sectarian animosities that were weaponized during the conflict.
Why the Stability is Precarious
The significance of Set Zaynab extends beyond its local population due to its status as a center of religious pilgrimage. Because the town is a focal point for devotees, any lapse in security or a resurgence of sectarian violence could have repercussions that ripple far beyond the borders of southern Damascus.
The persistence of these tensions suggests that the “peace” currently experienced is primarily a negative peace—defined by the absence of violence—rather than a positive peace, which would involve the presence of justice, reconciliation, and social integration. When security is maintained primarily through state control or the presence of armed factions rather than through organic community trust, the stability remains superficial. In Set Zaynab, the lack of a formal, community-led reconciliation process means that grievances remain unaddressed, leaving the town vulnerable to triggers that could reignite old divisions.
Background and Context of the Conflict
To understand the current fragility of Set Zaynab, it is necessary to examine the role the town played during the Syrian Civil War. As a site of significant religious importance, Set Zaynab became a symbolic and strategic prize. During the conflict, the town was a flashpoint for clashes between various factions, including pro-government forces, Iranian-backed militias, and opposition groups.
The war in this region was not merely a political struggle for power but was frequently framed in sectarian terms. The targeting of religious sites and the rhetoric used by combatants on all sides deepened the divide between different denominations and ethnic groups. This period of intense polarization transformed neighbors into adversaries and turned religious identity into a marker of loyalty or a target for violence.
The resulting trauma is multi-generational. Many residents witnessed the destruction of their homes or the loss of family members in sectarian-motivated attacks. This history created a legacy of suspicion that persists even in the absence of active fighting. The “invisible barriers” mentioned by residents—psychological trauma and social suspicion—are the direct result of a conflict that sought to define the population by their religious affiliations rather than their shared civic identity.
Analysis:
The situation in Set Zaynab illustrates a profound gap between the cessation of military hostilities and the achievement of genuine social cohesion. The persistence of sectarian fear suggests that the institutional stability provided by the state has failed to address the underlying communal distrust. In regions where religious identity was heavily politicized or targeted during the war, the transition to peace is often hindered by psychological barriers that are more difficult to resolve than formal ceasefires.
The state’s approach to stability in Syria has largely focused on the restoration of administrative control and the physical securing of territory. However, the Set Zaynab experience demonstrates that state-led security is not a substitute for social reconciliation. When the state prioritizes “order” over “healing,” it may successfully stop the violence, but it does not remove the incentives for future conflict. The reliance on security apparatuses to maintain peace often reinforces the very divisions it seeks to manage, as it maintains a hierarchy of power based on wartime loyalties.
What to Watch Next
As Syria continues its slow and uneven recovery, several key indicators will determine whether Set Zaynab can move toward a more sustainable peace:
First, the role of external actors and militias will be critical. The presence of foreign-backed forces in and around southern Damascus continues to influence the local power dynamic. A reduction in the influence of these groups may be necessary to allow local communities to engage in authentic, autonomous reconciliation.
Second, the emergence of local initiatives for dialogue. Whether the community develops grassroots mechanisms to resolve disputes and address historical grievances—without the mediation of state security forces—will be a primary indicator of genuine social healing.
Third, the impact of economic instability. As Syria faces severe economic crises, competition for dwindling resources often falls along sectarian or tribal lines. If economic hardship increases, the fragile social peace in Set Zaynab could be further strained, as scarcity often empowers those who use sectarian narratives to mobilize support.
Conclusion
Set Zaynab stands as a poignant reminder that the end of a war is not the beginning of peace. The town’s struggle to overcome the psychological remnants of the Syrian conflict highlights the necessity of holistic recovery processes that prioritize mental health, social dialogue, and the dismantling of sectarian narratives. Until the “invisible barriers” of suspicion and trauma are addressed, the peace in southern Damascus will remain a fragile veneer, masking a society that is still very much at war with its own history.
Sources:
Al Jazeera News: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/7/29/fragile-peace-in-syrias-set-zaynab-as-sectarian-challenges-persist?traffic_source=rss
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Al Jazeera News — source
