The International Cricket Council (ICC) is exploring a major overhaul of the Cricket World Cup format that could guarantee a second high-stakes match between India and Pakistan, a move aimed at maximizing viewership and revenue in the sport’s most lucrative market. The proposal, still in its early stages, would expand the tournament’s structure to include an additional group stage, potentially doubling the number of encounters between the two cricketing rivals.
If approved, the revamp would mark the first significant structural change to the World Cup since 2019, when the ICC introduced a round-robin format followed by knockout stages. The new plan could see teams compete in two group phases, increasing the total number of matches and ensuring that top sides—particularly India and Pakistan—face each other at least twice if they progress. The ICC is expected to finalize its decision in upcoming board meetings, with commercial viability and competitive fairness at the center of the debate.
What Happened?
Reports indicate that the ICC’s working committee has discussed expanding the World Cup beyond its current 10-team format, which has been in place since the 2019 edition. The proposed changes would reintroduce elements of the 2015 tournament, which featured 14 teams divided into two groups, followed by a second group stage for the top performers. Under this model, India and Pakistan—two of the most high-profile teams—could meet in both the initial group phase and a later stage, such as a “Super Six” or knockout round.
The current format, while praised for its simplicity, has faced criticism for limiting the number of matches for lower-ranked teams and reducing the tournament’s overall revenue potential. The ICC’s financial model relies heavily on broadcast rights, sponsorships, and digital engagement, with India-Pakistan matches serving as the single biggest driver of commercial success. A second encounter between the two nations could generate hundreds of millions of dollars in additional revenue, particularly from South Asian markets where cricket viewership is unparalleled.
Why It Matters
The potential inclusion of a second India-Pakistan match underscores the ICC’s growing emphasis on commercial imperatives over purely sporting considerations. The rivalry between the two nations is among the most-watched sporting events globally, with television audiences often exceeding 500 million for a single match. In 2023, the India-Pakistan group-stage encounter at the ODI World Cup in Ahmedabad drew an estimated 300 million live viewers, setting a new record for a cricket match. A second meeting in the same tournament could push these numbers even higher, benefiting broadcasters, sponsors, and the ICC’s own revenue streams.
However, the proposal also raises ethical and competitive concerns. Critics argue that prioritizing marquee fixtures over competitive balance could undermine the integrity of the tournament. Smaller cricketing nations, such as Afghanistan, Ireland, or the Netherlands, may find themselves sidelined if the format disproportionately favors established teams. Additionally, the geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan—whose cricketing ties have been sporadic due to diplomatic strains—add a layer of complexity. While the ICC has historically managed to stage matches between the two sides despite political friction, the commercialization of their rivalry could be seen as exploiting a sensitive dynamic for financial gain.
Background and Context
The ICC’s push for a revamped World Cup format reflects broader trends in global sports, where governing bodies increasingly prioritize revenue generation and fan engagement. The 2019 World Cup, which featured a round-robin stage followed by semi-finals and a final, was widely regarded as a success in terms of competitive balance. However, it also highlighted the financial limitations of a shorter tournament. The 2023 edition, held in India, generated record revenues of $1.3 billion, but the ICC has signaled that there is room for further growth, particularly if the format can be optimized to include more high-profile matches.
The India-Pakistan rivalry has long been the cornerstone of the ICC’s commercial strategy. The two teams have not played a bilateral series since 2012 due to political tensions, making their World Cup encounters even more significant. The last time they met twice in a single World Cup was in 2015, when they faced off in the group stage and later in the quarter-finals. That tournament, which featured 14 teams, saw higher overall viewership compared to the 10-team format used in 2019 and 2023.
Competing Claims and Uncertainty
While the ICC has not officially confirmed the details of the proposed format, multiple reports suggest that the governing body is weighing several options:
1. Expanded Group Stage: A return to a 14-team format with two groups, followed by a second group stage for the top teams. This would increase the total number of matches from 48 (in the current 10-team format) to 54 or more, ensuring more games for lower-ranked teams while also creating opportunities for additional India-Pakistan encounters.
2. Hybrid Model: A 12-team tournament with an initial group stage, followed by a “Super Six” round where the top teams from each group advance. This model would strike a balance between competitive fairness and commercial appeal, though it may not guarantee a second India-Pakistan match unless both teams progress.
3. Knockout Expansion: Introducing a quarter-final stage in addition to semi-finals and a final, which could provide another opportunity for India and Pakistan to meet if they advance. However, this would not necessarily increase the total number of matches as significantly as the other proposals.
The ICC’s decision will likely hinge on two key factors:
– Broadcast Revenue: The governing body will assess whether the additional matches justify the logistical and financial costs of expanding the tournament. Broadcasters, particularly in India, have historically paid a premium for India-Pakistan fixtures, and a second match could drive up rights fees.
– Competitive Integrity: The ICC must balance commercial interests with the need to maintain a fair and competitive tournament. Smaller nations have repeatedly called for greater inclusion, and any format change that appears to favor established teams could face backlash.
What to Watch Next
1. ICC Board Meetings: The governing body is expected to discuss the proposed changes in its upcoming meetings, with a decision likely before the end of 2026. The ICC’s new chairman, Greg Barclay, has previously indicated a willingness to explore format changes to enhance the World Cup’s appeal.
2. Broadcast and Sponsor Reactions: Key stakeholders, including Disney Star (India’s official broadcaster) and ICC’s global sponsors, will play a crucial role in shaping the final decision. Their willingness to commit additional funding for an expanded tournament will be a critical factor.
3. Player and Fan Sentiment: Cricket’s global fanbase is deeply divided on the issue. While Indian and Pakistani fans would likely welcome a second encounter, supporters of smaller nations may oppose any changes that reduce their teams’ chances of progressing. Player associations, such as the FICA (Federation of International Cricketers’ Associations), may also weigh in on the workload implications of an expanded tournament.
4. Geopolitical Developments: The India-Pakistan cricketing relationship remains hostage to broader diplomatic tensions. While the ICC has managed to stage World Cup matches between the two sides despite political strains, any escalation in bilateral relations could disrupt plans for a second encounter.
Conclusion
The ICC’s consideration of a revamped World Cup format—with the potential for a second India-Pakistan clash—highlights the governing body’s dual priorities: maximizing commercial revenue while maintaining the tournament’s competitive integrity. The proposal, if approved, would mark a significant shift in the structure of cricket’s premier event, with far-reaching implications for broadcasters, sponsors, and fans.
However, the move is not without risks. Critics argue that prioritizing marquee fixtures over competitive fairness could alienate smaller cricketing nations and undermine the sport’s global growth. Additionally, the geopolitical sensitivities surrounding the India-Pakistan rivalry add a layer of complexity that the ICC must navigate carefully.
As the governing body deliberates, the cricketing world will be watching closely. The decision will not only shape the future of the World Cup but also set a precedent for how major sporting events balance commercial interests with the spirit of the game.
Story synopsis gathered from: Google News India — source.
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Google News India — source.
