NEW DELHI — The deaths of 13 Indian seafarers and the disappearance of three others in a spate of attacks on commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz since late February have triggered a sharp diplomatic response from India, which summoned Iran’s envoy in New Delhi on Tuesday to demand accountability. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed that both targeted ships—the MV True Confidence and the MV Chem Pluto—were carrying a combined 30 Indian crew members, underscoring the disproportionate toll on India’s maritime workforce amid rising tensions in the Gulf.
The attacks, which the U.S. has attributed to Iran, have exposed the vulnerability of civilian shipping in one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for oil and trade. India, which imports nearly 80% of its crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz, has called for restraint while ramping up naval patrols in the region. The incidents mark a dangerous escalation in a proxy conflict that has increasingly ensnared neutral commercial vessels, with Indian seafarers paying the highest price.
—
What Happened
The first fatal attack occurred on March 6, when the Barbados-flagged bulk carrier MV True Confidence was struck by a missile in the Gulf of Oman, approximately 50 nautical miles southwest of Yemen’s port city of Aden. The vessel, managed by a Greek company, was en route from Sri Lanka to Saudi Arabia when it was hit. The strike killed three crew members—including Sanjay Varma, a 41-year-old seafarer from Pune—and injured several others. Varma’s family confirmed his death on Monday after days of uncertainty, with his brother telling The Indian Express that the shipping company had initially listed him as missing.
Six days later, on March 12, the Liberian-flagged oil tanker MV Chem Pluto was targeted by a drone while transiting the Strait of Hormuz. The attack, which occurred about 200 nautical miles off the coast of Gujarat, caused a fire on board but resulted in no casualties among the 21 Indian crew members. The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) stated that the drone bore “Iranian characteristics” and was launched from Iranian territory, a claim Tehran has vehemently denied. Iran’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the allegations as “baseless,” accusing Washington of fabricating evidence to justify its military presence in the region.
In a statement on Tuesday, the MEA confirmed that 13 Indian nationals have been killed and three remain missing since February 28, though it did not specify whether all deaths occurred in the two most recent attacks. The ministry’s condemnation was unequivocal: “India strongly condemns the attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The safety and security of Indian seafarers is of paramount importance, and we demand that all parties exercise restraint and respect international maritime law.”
—
Why It Matters
The Strait of Hormuz, a 21-mile-wide waterway separating Iran and Oman, is the world’s most critical oil transit route, handling about one-fifth of global crude shipments. For India, which sources nearly 60% of its oil imports from the Middle East, the strait is a lifeline. Any disruption—whether through military action, blockades, or piracy—threatens not only energy security but also the livelihoods of the 250,000 Indian seafarers who make up roughly 10% of the global maritime workforce.
The attacks come at a time of heightened regional instability, with Iran-backed groups—including the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq and Syria—engaging in near-daily clashes with U.S. and Israeli forces. The U.S. has accused Iran of orchestrating a “shadow war” against commercial shipping, pointing to a pattern of drone and missile strikes on vessels linked to Israel, the U.S., or their allies. Tehran, in turn, has framed its actions as retaliation for Western support of Israel in its war against Hamas in Gaza.
For India, the crisis presents a diplomatic tightrope. New Delhi has long sought to maintain balanced relations with both Iran and the U.S., leveraging its ties with Tehran for access to Central Asia via the Chabahar Port while deepening defense and economic cooperation with Washington. The summoning of Iran’s envoy—a rare and pointed diplomatic rebuke—signals India’s growing frustration with Tehran’s role in destabilizing a region critical to its interests. However, analysts warn that overtly siding with the U.S. could jeopardize India’s energy imports and its strategic investments in Iran.
—
Background and Context
The Strait of Hormuz has been a flashpoint for decades, with Iran repeatedly threatening to close the waterway in response to Western sanctions. In 2019, tensions peaked after the U.S. assassinated Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, prompting Iran to retaliate with missile strikes on U.S. bases in Iraq. The following year, Iran seized a South Korean oil tanker and briefly detained a British-flagged vessel, escalating fears of a broader conflict.
The current wave of attacks began in late 2023, coinciding with the Israel-Hamas war. The Houthis, who control much of northern Yemen, have launched dozens of drone and missile strikes on ships in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, targeting vessels they claim are linked to Israel. The U.S. and UK have responded with airstrikes on Houthi positions, but the group has vowed to continue its campaign until Israel ends its offensive in Gaza.
Iran’s alleged involvement in the latest attacks on the True Confidence and Chem Pluto marks a significant escalation, as both vessels were not directly linked to Israel or the U.S. The True Confidence was a bulk carrier with no apparent ties to Western interests, while the Chem Pluto was transporting oil to India—a country Iran has historically sought to cultivate as an energy partner. The indiscriminate nature of the strikes has raised concerns that civilian shipping is now fair game in the broader regional conflict.
—
Competing Claims and Uncertainty
The attribution of the attacks remains a major point of contention:
– U.S. Position: CENTCOM has stated that the drone used in the Chem Pluto attack was of Iranian origin, citing “intelligence, weapons debris, and expert analysis.” The U.S. has also accused Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of providing weapons and training to the Houthis, enabling them to carry out long-range strikes. In a statement on March 13, U.S. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said, “There is no doubt that Iran is the primary enabler of the Houthis’ destabilizing actions in the Red Sea and beyond.”
– Iran’s Denial: Tehran has dismissed the allegations as “propaganda,” with Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanaani calling them “a desperate attempt to justify America’s military presence in the region.” Iran has long denied direct involvement in Houthi attacks, though it has acknowledged providing political and moral support to the group. In a rare admission in 2022, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei praised the Houthis for their “resistance” against Saudi Arabia and its allies.
– India’s Stance: New Delhi has avoided explicitly blaming Iran, instead calling for an independent investigation. The MEA’s statement emphasized the need for “de-escalation and dialogue,” reflecting India’s traditional diplomatic caution. However, the summoning of Iran’s envoy—a step typically reserved for serious disputes—suggests growing impatience with Tehran’s denials.
Key Unanswered Questions:
1. Who ordered the attacks? While the U.S. points to Iran, Tehran has not claimed responsibility, and the Houthis have not issued a statement linking themselves to the True Confidence or Chem Pluto incidents.
2. What was the motive? If Iran was behind the strikes, was it retaliation for U.S. support of Israel, or an attempt to pressure India into reducing its cooperation with Washington?
3. Will India take further action? New Delhi has so far limited its response to diplomatic protests and increased naval patrols. However, if attacks on Indian-crewed vessels continue, pressure may grow for economic or military measures, such as suspending oil imports from Iran or joining U.S.-led maritime coalitions.
—
What to Watch Next
1. Iran’s Response to India’s Diplomatic Protest
Tehran has historically been sensitive to criticism from non-Western countries, particularly those it views as neutral or friendly. If Iran perceives India’s summoning of its envoy as a shift toward the U.S. camp, it may retaliate by reducing oil exports to India or delaying projects like the Chabahar Port, which India has invested over $500 million in developing. Conversely, Iran could seek to mend fences by offering assurances on seafarer safety or even financial compensation to the families of the deceased.
2. U.S. Pressure on India to Join Maritime Coalitions
The U.S. has been pushing India to participate in Operation Prosperity Guardian, a multinational task force aimed at protecting shipping in the Red Sea. So far, India has resisted, preferring to conduct independent patrols in the Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea. However, if attacks on Indian-crewed vessels persist, Washington may increase pressure on New Delhi to take a more active role in countering Iran-backed threats.
3. Impact on Global Shipping and Oil Prices
The Strait of Hormuz is already seeing reduced traffic, with several major shipping companies rerouting vessels around the Cape of Good Hope—a longer and costlier alternative. If attacks continue, insurers may hike premiums for ships transiting the region, leading to higher fuel prices. India, which imports 85% of its oil, would be particularly vulnerable to such disruptions.
4. Domestic Political Fallout in India
The deaths of Indian seafarers have sparked outrage in Parliament, with opposition parties accusing the government of failing to protect its citizens. The Congress party has demanded a special session to discuss the crisis, while maritime unions have called for stricter safety protocols and government-backed insurance for seafarers in high-risk zones. The government may face pressure to negotiate bilateral agreements with Gulf countries to ensure the safety of Indian crews.
5. Potential for Further Escalation
If Iran continues to target commercial shipping, the U.S. and its allies may expand their military response, potentially striking Iranian soil or IRGC assets. Such a move could draw India into the conflict, either through diplomatic pressure or direct threats to its energy supplies. Alternatively, Iran may seek to de-escalate by reining in the Houthis or offering concessions to neutral countries like India.
—
Conclusion
The deaths of 13 Indian seafarers in the Strait of Hormuz attacks are a grim reminder of the human cost of geopolitical conflicts. For India, the crisis presents a triple challenge: protecting its citizens, safeguarding its energy supplies, and navigating the treacherous diplomatic waters between Iran and the U.S. While New Delhi has so far pursued a measured response, the stakes are rising with each attack.
The coming weeks will test India’s ability to balance its strategic interests without being drawn into a wider conflict. If Iran continues to target civilian shipping, India may be forced to reassess its neutral stance, potentially aligning more closely with the U.S. or seeking alternative energy routes. For now, the government’s focus remains on securing the release of the missing seafarers and preventing further loss of life. But with tensions in the Gulf showing no signs of abating, the safety of Indian crews—and the stability of global trade—hangs in the balance.
Story synopsis gathered from: Google News India — source.
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Google News India – Top Stories — source.
