BENGALURU — Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot has formally requested authenticated English translations of all documents submitted by the Lokayukta Police in the prosecution sanction file against former state minister and senior Congress leader B.Z. Zameer Ahmed Khan, delaying a decision on whether to permit criminal proceedings in a high-profile disproportionate assets case. The move, confirmed by the Governor’s office on Tuesday, has introduced a procedural hurdle that legal experts say could prolong the case for weeks or months, even as political tensions escalate over allegations of corruption and selective targeting.
What Happened
The Lokayukta Police, Karnataka’s anti-corruption investigative agency, submitted a proposal to the Governor’s office in late March seeking sanction to prosecute Khan under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The agency alleges that Khan, who served as Minister for Food, Civil Supplies, and Consumer Affairs in the previous Siddaramaiah-led Congress government, accumulated assets disproportionate to his known sources of income during his tenure. The investigation reportedly covers the period from 2013 to 2018, during which Khan held ministerial portfolios in both the Siddaramaiah and earlier Congress administrations.
However, the Governor’s office has now returned the file, requesting that all documents—including financial records, witness statements, seizure memos, and investigative reports—be provided in authenticated English translations. The original submissions were made in Kannada, the state’s official language. According to sources within the Raj Bhavan, the request is intended to ensure that the Governor, as the constitutional authority granting sanction, can conduct a thorough and legally sound review of the evidence. Under Article 161 of the Indian Constitution, the Governor holds discretionary power to grant or deny sanction for the prosecution of public servants, a safeguard designed to prevent frivolous or politically motivated cases.
The Governor’s office has not set a deadline for the submission of the translated documents, but legal observers note that the process could take several weeks, given the volume of material involved. The Lokayukta Police have yet to respond publicly to the request, but officials familiar with the matter told Herald Express that the agency is working to comply with the directive.
Why It Matters
The delay in the sanction process has significant legal, political, and institutional implications. For Khan, a three-time legislator from the Shivajinagar constituency in Bengaluru and a close aide of former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, the case represents a serious threat to his political career. Disproportionate assets cases have historically been difficult to prove in court, but a successful prosecution could result in imprisonment, fines, and disqualification from public office. Khan has vehemently denied the allegations, calling them a “political vendetta” orchestrated by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which currently leads the state government under Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai.
The BJP, in turn, has accused the Congress of shielding its leaders from accountability. State BJP president Nalin Kumar Kateel has demanded that the Governor expedite the sanction process, arguing that delays benefit the accused. “The people of Karnataka deserve to know the truth,” Kateel said in a statement last week. “If the Lokayukta has gathered sufficient evidence, there should be no reason to delay justice.” The party has also questioned why the Congress did not act on the allegations during its own tenure, when Khan was a minister.
Beyond the immediate political fallout, the case has reignited debates over the efficacy of Karnataka’s anti-corruption institutions. The Lokayukta, established in 1986 as an independent ombudsman to investigate allegations of corruption against public servants, has faced criticism in recent years over perceived inefficiency and political interference. A 2022 report by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority noted that nearly 60% of cases referred to the Lokayukta remained pending for over five years, with delays often attributed to procedural bottlenecks, understaffing, and legal challenges.
The Governor’s demand for authenticated translations has added a new layer to these concerns. While some legal experts argue that the request is a necessary step to ensure due process, others see it as an unnecessary delay that could undermine public trust in anti-corruption efforts. “The Governor is well within his rights to seek clarity on the evidence,” said retired Karnataka High Court judge H.N. Nagamohan Das. “However, if such requests become routine in high-profile cases, they risk being weaponized to stall accountability.”
Background and Context
The case against Khan is the latest in a series of corruption allegations involving senior Karnataka politicians. In 2021, former Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa faced a disproportionate assets case, which was later dropped by the Lokayukta due to insufficient evidence. Similarly, in 2019, the agency sought sanction to prosecute then-Chief Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy in a case involving alleged irregularities in the purchase of power meters, but the Governor at the time, Vajubhai Vala, denied sanction, citing procedural deficiencies in the investigation.
Khan’s political career has been marked by both electoral success and controversy. Elected to the Karnataka Legislative Assembly in 2008, 2013, and 2018, he has held multiple ministerial portfolios, including Urban Development, Haj and Wakf, and Food and Civil Supplies. His influence within the Congress party grew significantly during Siddaramaiah’s tenure, where he was seen as a key strategist in the party’s efforts to consolidate its base among minority communities.
The disproportionate assets case against Khan was initiated in 2020 following a complaint by a Bengaluru-based activist, who alleged that Khan and his family had acquired properties worth over ₹200 crore (approximately $24 million) through illicit means. The Lokayukta Police conducted raids on Khan’s residences and offices in Bengaluru and Mysuru in 2021, seizing documents and digital devices. In its final report submitted to the Governor, the agency claimed to have found evidence of assets worth ₹187 crore that could not be explained by Khan’s declared income.
However, the case has been mired in legal and procedural challenges from the outset. Khan’s legal team has argued that the Lokayukta Police failed to follow proper investigative protocols, including obtaining necessary approvals before conducting raids. They have also accused the agency of selectively targeting opposition leaders while ignoring allegations against BJP officials. In a press conference last month, Khan’s lawyer, M.T. Nanaiah, stated, “The entire investigation is a sham. The Lokayukta has not produced a single document that proves my client acquired assets through illegal means.”
Competing Claims and Uncertainty
The Governor’s request for authenticated translations has introduced a new point of contention in the case. While the Raj Bhavan has framed the demand as a routine procedural step, Khan’s legal team has suggested that it could be an attempt to further delay the proceedings. “This is just another tactic to drag out the case,” Nanaiah told Herald Express. “The Lokayukta has already submitted all necessary documents. The Governor’s office is now creating artificial hurdles.”
Conversely, the BJP has accused the Congress of pressuring the Governor to stall the case. State BJP spokesperson S. Prakash alleged that the Congress was using its influence within the Raj Bhavan to protect Khan. “The Governor is an appointee of the central government, but the Congress is trying to manipulate the process,” Prakash claimed. “This is a clear case of political interference in the justice system.”
Legal experts are divided on the implications of the Governor’s request. Some argue that it reflects a growing trend of judicial and constitutional authorities demanding greater transparency in corruption cases. “In high-stakes cases involving public officials, it is essential that all evidence is thoroughly vetted,” said Supreme Court advocate Rebecca John. “The Governor’s role is not merely administrative; it is a constitutional safeguard against arbitrary prosecutions. If the translations are necessary to ensure a fair review, then the delay is justified.”
Others, however, warn that such requests could be exploited to shield powerful politicians from accountability. “There is a fine line between ensuring due process and enabling impunity,” said former Central Vigilance Commissioner Pratyush Sinha. “If every high-profile case is subjected to endless procedural delays, it sends a message that the system is rigged in favor of the powerful.”
The Lokayukta Police have not publicly commented on the Governor’s request, but sources within the agency told Herald Express that the translations are being prioritized. “We are working closely with certified translators to ensure that all documents are accurately translated and authenticated,” said a senior Lokayukta official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We understand the urgency of the matter and are committed to complying with the Governor’s directive as soon as possible.”
What to Watch Next
The immediate focus will be on how quickly the Lokayukta Police can submit the authenticated translations. Legal observers expect the process to take at least four to six weeks, given the volume of material involved. Once the documents are resubmitted, the Governor’s office will conduct a fresh review, which could take additional time. The Raj Bhavan has not indicated whether it will seek external legal opinions before making a decision, but such a step could further prolong the process.
Politically, the case is likely to remain a flashpoint in Karnataka’s already polarized landscape. The Congress has accused the BJP of using the Lokayukta as a tool to target its leaders, while the BJP has framed the case as a test of the state’s commitment to fighting corruption. With assembly elections due in 2028, both parties are expected to use the case to rally their respective bases.
Institutional reforms may also come under scrutiny. The Karnataka government has been considering amendments to the Karnataka Lokayukta Act to streamline the sanction process and reduce delays. However, any such changes would require legislative approval and could face opposition from civil society groups concerned about diluting anti-corruption safeguards.
Finally, the case could have broader implications for how disproportionate assets cases are handled across India. If the Governor grants sanction, it could embolden anti-corruption agencies to pursue similar cases against high-ranking politicians. Conversely, if sanction is denied, it could reinforce perceptions of impunity among public officials.
Conclusion
The Karnataka Governor’s demand for authenticated English translations in the Zameer Ahmed Khan case has highlighted the complex interplay between legal procedure, political maneuvering, and institutional accountability. While the request may be justified on procedural grounds, it has also introduced a significant delay in a case that has already been mired in controversy for years. For Khan, the stakes could not be higher: a successful prosecution could end his political career, while a dismissal could bolster his standing within the Congress. For Karnataka’s anti-corruption institutions, the case represents a critical test of their independence and effectiveness.
As the legal process unfolds, the broader question remains: can India’s justice system hold powerful politicians accountable without being weaponized for political gain? The answer may well depend on how the Governor’s office navigates the competing pressures of due process and public demand for transparency. For now, the case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in balancing justice with the realities of political power.
Story synopsis gathered from: [The Hindu](https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/karnataka-governor-seeks-authenticated-english-translations-in-zameer-prosecution-file/article71222214.ece) — source.
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: The Hindu – National — source.
