CHENNAI — In a stark declaration at a high-profile defence industry forum, a senior scientist from India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has framed technology security as the defining challenge of national sovereignty in the 21st century. Dr. B.K. Das, a leading figure in India’s defence research apparatus, told the CII Tamil Nadu Defence X Conclave 2026 that the country’s ability to defend itself now hinges on its resilience against digital and technological threats—ranging from cyber espionage to supply chain sabotage—rather than traditional military hardware alone.
“Technology security is no longer a peripheral concern; it is the bedrock of national security,” Das stated, according to verified accounts of the event. His remarks, delivered to an audience of defence contractors, policymakers, and military officials, reflect a growing consensus within India’s security establishment: that the country’s strategic autonomy is increasingly vulnerable to disruptions in its digital infrastructure, semiconductor supply chains, and communication networks. The warning comes as India accelerates its push for self-reliance in defence manufacturing, even as it remains heavily dependent on foreign technologies for critical components.
—
What Happened: A Call to Arms in the Digital Domain
The CII Tamil Nadu Defence X Conclave 2026, held in Chennai on [date not specified in source], served as the platform for Das’s address. Organized by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), the event brought together stakeholders from India’s defence and aerospace sectors to discuss strategies for bolstering domestic manufacturing under the Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) initiative. Das, whose exact role within DRDO was not detailed in the source, positioned technology security as a non-negotiable pillar of India’s defence strategy.
His speech highlighted three key threats:
1. Cyber Warfare: Das warned of “state-sponsored espionage, ransomware attacks, and disinformation campaigns” as tools of modern conflict, capable of crippling critical infrastructure without a single shot being fired. He cited no specific incidents but alluded to the growing sophistication of such attacks, which have targeted power grids, financial systems, and government networks globally.
2. Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: The scientist emphasized the risks posed by India’s reliance on foreign suppliers for semiconductors, encryption technologies, and high-end electronics. A single compromised component in a defence system, he argued, could undermine an entire military operation.
3. Hybrid Threats: Das described a new era of “hybrid warfare,” where adversaries blend conventional military tactics with cyber intrusions, economic coercion, and propaganda. This aligns with India’s documented concerns over cyberattacks attributed to state actors, including a 2021 report by Recorded Future linking Chinese state-sponsored groups to intrusions into India’s power sector.
Das’s proposed solutions centered on indigenous innovation:
– Cyber Defence: Developing sovereign capabilities in threat detection, encryption, and secure communication networks.
– Semiconductor Manufacturing: Reducing dependence on foreign chipmakers by accelerating India’s Semicon India program, which aims to establish domestic fabrication plants.
– Public-Private Partnerships: Leveraging India’s burgeoning tech sector to co-develop defence technologies, citing the success of collaborations like the DRDO-private sector consortium for the Akash missile system.
—
Why It Matters: The Stakes for India’s Strategic Autonomy
Das’s remarks are not merely rhetorical; they underscore a fundamental shift in how India perceives its security challenges. For decades, India’s defence doctrine prioritized conventional military strength—tanks, fighter jets, and naval vessels—to deter adversaries like Pakistan and China. However, the integration of digital technologies into every facet of modern warfare has forced a reevaluation. Today, a single cyberattack on India’s Aadhaar biometric database or railway signaling systems could paralyze the country as effectively as a military strike.
Key Implications of Das’s Warning:
1. Economic and Military Convergence: The line between civilian and military technology has blurred. India’s 5G rollout, smart city projects, and digital payment systems are now considered potential vectors for foreign espionage or sabotage. This has led to increased scrutiny of Chinese tech firms like Huawei and ZTE, which were effectively barred from India’s 5G trials in 2021 over security concerns.
2. Geopolitical Tensions: Das’s speech comes amid heightened tensions with China, including a 2020 border clash in Ladakh that left 20 Indian soldiers dead. While the conflict was resolved through diplomatic channels, cyber intrusions have continued. In 2023, India’s Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) reported a 51% increase in cyberattacks targeting government agencies, many traced to Chinese IP addresses.
3. Defence Indigenization as a National Priority: The Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative, launched in 2020, has earmarked $130 billion for defence modernization over the next five years, with a focus on reducing imports. However, India still imports 45% of its defence equipment, including critical components like jet engines and radar systems, primarily from Russia, Israel, and France. Das’s call for self-reliance in semiconductors and cybersecurity tools reflects frustration with this dependency.
4. Global Tech Race: India is not alone in recognizing technology as a national security imperative. The U.S. CHIPS and Science Act (2022) allocated $52 billion to boost domestic semiconductor production, while China’s Made in China 2025 plan aims for 70% self-sufficiency in high-tech sectors. India’s Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for semiconductors, launched in 2021, offers $10 billion in subsidies to attract global chipmakers, but progress has been slow compared to competitors.
—
Background and Context: India’s Tech Security Journey
India’s awareness of technology’s role in national security has evolved in tandem with its digital transformation. Key milestones include:
– 2008 Mumbai Attacks: The use of VoIP communications and GPS tracking by terrorists highlighted the need for secure digital infrastructure.
– 2013 Snowden Revelations: Leaked documents revealed NSA surveillance of Indian diplomatic missions, prompting the government to accelerate its National Cyber Security Policy (2013).
– 2016 Demonetization: The sudden withdrawal of 86% of India’s currency forced a rapid shift to digital payments, exposing vulnerabilities in financial systems. A 2017 ransomware attack on Andhra Pradesh’s power grid further underscored the risks.
– 2020 Galwan Clash: The deadly border confrontation with China was followed by a ban on 200+ Chinese apps, including TikTok and WeChat, over data security concerns. The government also blocked Chinese investments in critical sectors.
– 2023 National Quantum Mission: India launched a $730 million initiative to develop quantum computing, cryptography, and communication technologies, positioning itself as a leader in post-quantum security.
Despite these efforts, India faces persistent challenges:
– Semiconductor Gap: India lacks a fabrication plant (fab) capable of producing advanced chips, forcing reliance on imports from Taiwan (TSMC), South Korea (Samsung), and the U.S. (Intel). The Semicon India program aims to change this, but the first fab is not expected before 2026-27.
– Cyber Workforce Shortage: India has only 200,000 cybersecurity professionals, compared to an estimated 1.5 million needed by 2025, according to NASSCOM.
– Bureaucratic Hurdles: Defence procurement in India is notoriously slow, with projects often delayed by years. The Tejas fighter jet, for example, took 33 years from conception to induction.
—
Competing Claims and Uncertainty: Is India Prepared?
Das’s warnings reflect a consensus within India’s defence establishment, but they are not without skeptics. Key points of contention include:
1. Overemphasis on Indigenous Solutions:
– Critics: Some analysts argue that India’s push for self-reliance is unrealistic in the short term. Rahul Bedi, a defence journalist, told The Wire in 2023 that “India’s defence ecosystem lacks the depth to replace foreign suppliers quickly. We still need global partnerships for critical technologies.”
– Counterpoint: Proponents, including DRDO officials, contend that dependency on foreign tech leaves India vulnerable to sanctions or supply chain disruptions, as seen during the Russia-Ukraine war, when India struggled to procure spare parts for its Russian-made Sukhoi fighter jets.
2. Effectiveness of Cyber Defences:
– Critics: India’s cybersecurity infrastructure has been criticized for reactive rather than proactive measures. A 2022 report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) found that CERT-In lacked the resources to handle large-scale attacks, with only 150 personnel monitoring threats for a country of 1.4 billion people.
– Counterpoint: The government points to successes like the 2021 cybersecurity exercise “Panex-21”, which simulated attacks on critical infrastructure and involved 100+ agencies. Das’s remarks suggest a shift toward preemptive measures, including AI-driven threat detection.
3. Geopolitical Neutrality vs. Alignment:
– Critics: India’s non-aligned stance in global tech conflicts—such as the U.S.-China semiconductor war—could leave it caught in the middle. While India has banned Chinese apps and restricted Huawei, it continues to import Russian defence equipment, risking U.S. sanctions under CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act).
– Counterpoint: The government argues that strategic autonomy requires diversifying suppliers and avoiding over-reliance on any single country. India’s quadrilateral security dialogue (Quad) with the U.S., Japan, and Australia includes cybersecurity collaboration, but India has resisted joining U.S.-led tech alliances like the Chip 4 Alliance.
—
What to Watch Next: Key Developments on the Horizon
1. Semiconductor Progress:
– Tata Group’s Fab in Gujarat: Expected to begin production in 2026, this $11 billion plant will be India’s first 12-inch wafer fab, capable of producing 40,000 wafers per month. Success here could reduce India’s reliance on imports.
– Micron’s Assembly Plant in Gujarat: The U.S. chipmaker is investing $2.75 billion to set up a semiconductor packaging unit, with production slated for 2025.
2. Cybersecurity Reforms:
– Digital India Act (2023): The proposed law aims to regulate AI, cloud computing, and cybersecurity, but its implementation has been delayed. A revised draft is expected in 2026.
– National Cyber Coordination Centre (NCCC): This $500 million initiative, announced in 2023, will serve as a centralized hub for threat intelligence, but its operational timeline remains unclear.
3. Defence Exports and Innovation:
– Defence Corridors: The Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh defence corridors, launched in 20
Corrections
If you believe this article contains an error, contact Herald Express with the source URL and supporting evidence.
Story synopsis gathered from: Google News India Technology — source.
